Varies really. . . just look for one you like and will fit the bill nicely. . . I prefer 3X9X50 but there are a lot of people that would suggest bigger objective lens or more variable power, some kind of internal range finder and bullet drop compensator. . . . lol. . I do have a few of those also but for gen. purpose. . . 3×9 x 40 or 50 work just fine.
Excellent choice in rifle and caliber but poor choice in a scope. Spend a few more pesos and get something better, like a Leupold or Nikon in 3×9 or 4×12.
Bushnells aren’t the greatest of the scopes, but if you are going to hunt with it, then it’ll do a good job if you do your part (you could hit a grapefruit sized target at 300-400 yards with it. . . not a pencil point. . . ).
They don’t compare to the Redfields or the Leupolds, but then again, not everyone has $300+ to sink into optics.
Varies really. . . just look for one you like and will fit the bill nicely. . . I prefer 3X9X50 but there are a lot of people that would suggest bigger objective lens or more variable power, some kind of internal range finder and bullet drop compensator. . . . lol. . I do have a few of those also but for gen. purpose. . . 3×9 x 40 or 50 work just fine.
Good Luck. . Good Hunting
Excellent choice in rifle and caliber but poor choice in a scope. Spend a few more pesos and get something better, like a Leupold or Nikon in 3×9 or 4×12.
I’d actually advise against Bushnell. . . .
Bushnells aren’t the greatest of the scopes, but if you are going to hunt with it, then it’ll do a good job if you do your part (you could hit a grapefruit sized target at 300-400 yards with it. . . not a pencil point. . . ).
They don’t compare to the Redfields or the Leupolds, but then again, not everyone has $300+ to sink into optics.
I like Bushnell scopes and think they’re a good value for the money.
Are they Leupolds? No, and they don’t cost as much as Leupolds either.
I have a Sportview 4×32mm, a Sportsman 4×32mm and a Trophy 3-9×40mm.