Rifle Scopes from the Biggest Names in Game Hunting
cheap-hunting-scope.jpghunting-scopes.jpgnight-vision-hunting-scope.jpgrifle-hunting-scope.jpg

Experiences with Tasco Luminova telescopes?

I јυѕt ordered a Tasco Luminova 675×60mm Refractor EQ telescope. I wanted tο remain under $100. I’m јυѕt a beginner, аnd basically want tο view thе planets аnd moon. Dіd I mаkе a gοοd сhοісе wіth thіѕ scope?

Tags: , , ,

4 Responses to “Experiences with Tasco Luminova telescopes?”

  1. seahorse says:

    UNFORTUNATLY YOU GOT WHAT YOU PAID FOR. iT’S OK FOR A BEGINNER,BUT IT WON’T TAKE LONG WHEN YOU WILL BE INTERESTED IN MORE SCOPE.

  2. mathematician says:

    I’m sorry to say this, but you did not. A telescope with a 60mm objective should never be pushed above a magnification of about 200x.

    NEVER BUY A TELESCOPE BASED ON MAGNIFICATION!

    Ever.

    For under $100, I would recommend getting a pair of binoculars, not a telescope. You would be amazed at what a decent pair can show. After you decide that you like the hobby, you can get a starter scope for about $200.

  3. owenmurdoch says:

    A decent pair of binoculars is better than a cheap telescope.

    You can look at the moon and the planets, and scan the Milky Way and nebulae.

    Why didn’t you ask us BEFORE you bought it?

  4. heraclius@sbcglobal.net says:

    As someone else already said, *never* buy a telescope that markets itself primarily based on magnification. This is a sure sign that not only is the manufacturer playing on common assumption, but also that the scope itself is probably junk.

    That said, I used–and still use–such a telescope that I got for a present as a kid. If you treat it well, it will work well enough. A few pointers, though:

    1. ) Do not use the telescope above about 120x.
    2. ) The tripod will almost certainly be jittery in the slightest wind; you may want to weigh it down with something.
    3. ) Don’t use the Barlow. You should probably ditch the eyepieces as well, which I’m guessing are cheesy Ramsdens or Huygenians; even mine at least came with a decent Kellner. If you see an “SR”, “R”, or “H” symbol on the eyepieces, save your strength–order a few basic eyepieces from a reputable dealer (Orion, Meade, Celestron, etc. ), perhaps with an adapter as well, from . 965 to 1. 25 for a better field of view.

    Unfortunately, ordering this extra equipment will put you well above $100, making it almost worth returning the scope and buying a more expensive one. I leave that judgment to you, though–as someone else already wrote, this telescope could at least whet your appetite for something better.

    I’m sorry I can’t be cheerier, but good luck. For what it’s worth, there are a few excellent, but relatively cheap scopes that can be had from Orion for $200 and under, namely their XT 4. 5, which has had nothing but stellar reviews.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.